SYS// BRSTD-2026
UPLINK // AUTH_OK
LAT 24.86°N
LNG 67.00°E
ATELIER // v3.04
SIG ▮▮▮▮▮
PWR 98.4%
TEMP 36.6°C
FREQ 2400.0 MHz
PING 012 ms
PKTS 000000
RNG 000.0m
VEC 0.000,0.000
ID 0x000000
brainiac/studio

Digital Studio

brainiac/studiobrainiac/studio
Digital Marketing
03 · marketing / conversion optimization

More from the traffic you already pay for.

Doubling visitors is expensive. Improving what happens to the visitors you have is usually cheaper, faster, and permanent.

scroll
In short

We find where people drop off, form a hypothesis about why, and test a change against the current version so you know what caused any improvement. Usually four to eight weeks for a first round. Where traffic is too low to test, we say so.

Updated August 2026

Where people actually stop.

In rough order of how often we find a real problem there.

DROP-OFF BY STEPPage loadslow on mobile · they leave firstProduct pagemissing the one detail they neededCartshipping cost appears as a surpriseCheckouttoo many fields, forced accountPaymenttheir method is not offeredPage speed on mobile is the most common single largest win — and it is not a test.
what this actually means

Most conversion advice is guessing with confidence.

Make the button bigger. Add urgency. Reduce the form. Sometimes these help and sometimes they hurt, and without testing you cannot tell which happened — traffic varies week to week enough to hide a real effect entirely.

So the discipline is boring and it works: find where people actually stop, form a specific hypothesis about why, change one thing, and run both versions at once until the result is trustworthy.

The honest limitation is traffic. Testing needs enough visitors to reach a conclusion. Below that we do the research, fix the things that are plainly broken, and tell you that the rest is judgement rather than pretending it is science.

One changePer test, or it means nothing
4–8 wksTypical first round
All resultsReported, including failures
what we build

What we do.

01

Find where people actually stop

Analytics, session recordings, and watching a few real people. The problem is rarely where you assume.

02

Fix what is plainly broken first

A form that fails on mobile does not need a test. It needs fixing today.

03

Form specific hypotheses

Not 'improve the page'. 'People leave at shipping because the cost is a surprise, so we will show it earlier.'

04

Test one change at a time

Both versions running at once. Change three things and you learn nothing about any of them.

05

Run until the result is trustworthy

Stopping early because the numbers look good is the most common way tests mislead.

06

Speed as a conversion lever

Often the single largest improvement available, and it is not a test — it is just faster.

07

Mobile checked separately

It converts differently and usually worse. Averaging the two hides the problem.

08

Honest reporting

Including the tests that showed nothing, which is most of them, and the ones that made it worse.

Where the drop-offs usually are.

Ordered by how often we find a meaningful problem there.

StepTypical problemUsually fixable by
Page loadSlow on mobile, people leave firstImages and scripts — often the biggest single win
Product pageMissing the one detail they neededSizing, delivery time, real photography
CartShipping cost appears as a surpriseShowing it earlier, not hiding it
CheckoutToo many fields, forced accountGuest checkout, fewer fields
PaymentTheir method is not offeredLocal gateways that actually clear
FormsAsking for things you do not needRemoving fields — reliably works

What moves the number.

Biggest

Most common single largest win, and it is not a test — the page is just faster.

Page speed
+70%

Online sales, build and optimisation together.

Ten Little Toes
Separately

Converts differently and usually worse. Averaging hides it.

Mobile
use cases

When to do this.

01

You are already buying traffic

Every percentage point improves the return on all of it, permanently.

02

Traffic is fine, sales are not

The clearest signal that the problem is on the page, not in the acquisition.

03

You have enough visitors to test

Roughly a few hundred conversions a month. Below that, testing cannot conclude.

04

Not on a brand new site

With no traffic and no baseline there is nothing to optimise. Build and drive traffic first.

approach

How we work.

01

We check you have enough traffic

If not, we say so and do research instead of pretending a test will conclude.

02

We find the drop-off

Analytics and recordings. Where people stop, on which device.

03

We fix the obvious

Broken things and slow pages first. No test needed to justify making something work.

04

We write the hypothesis

Specific enough that the result means something either way.

05

We test one change

Both versions live, split evenly, running until the result is reliable.

06

We report honestly

Including the ones that did nothing — which is most — and the ones that hurt.

faq

Frequently asked.

5 questions answered. Still have one? Reach out.

Roughly a few hundred conversions a month to reach a trustworthy result in reasonable time. Below that, tests either run for months or conclude falsely. We check this before quoting, and if you do not have the volume we will say so and do research-led improvements instead — that is honest work, it is just not testing.

5 questions
Ask another →